How can media companies measure the value of content? Is editorial quality the only aspect? Or should they look at it from a pure commercial viewpoint?
{ 5 comments }
media
Media companies can only succeed in charging users for content if they provide unique value. Here are examples of how some sites try to achieve this.
{ 12 comments }
What could Apple do if it really wanted to revolutionize the media market? Here is one option.
{ 12 comments }
In no other country in the world people read as many newspapers as in Norway. Now readership numbers show a dramatic drop.
{ 37 comments }
From almost zero market share in january to 14,6 per cent in September: Android phones are picking up very fast in news consumption in Norway.
{ 1 comment }
Media companies face a critical choice as they struggle to introduce user payment for digital content:
Should they introduce separate products for each new platform, such as iPad, or try to sell a cross-platform subscription?
{ 13 comments }
What creates the greatest value for users? Professional editors’ careful selection of content from one source or sophisticated aggregation services picking relevant sources from numerous sources?
{ 4 comments }
The Times has put a wall around all its content while The Guardian invites everyone to republish their articles. It is two completely different strategies. Can both be winners?
{ 8 comments }
The Mail’s online miracle: or how to get paid without a paywall
by The Guardian on July 21, 2010 · 0 comments
The debate is always black and white: put up a paywall or lose money. But the Daily Mail’s website is getting so big it needn’t do either
{ 0 comments }