<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BetaTales &#187; hologram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betatales.com/tag/hologram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betatales.com</link>
	<description>Exploring digital media trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News holograms: Is it a threat to media&#8217;s credibility?</title>
		<link>http://www.betatales.com/2008/11/08/news-holograms-is-it-a-threat-to-medias-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betatales.com/2008/11/08/news-holograms-is-it-a-threat-to-medias-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Einar Sandvand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hologram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betatales.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was described as a hologram &#8211; and was used for the first time in the TV business. But is CNN&#8217;s hologram experiment really adding value to the news coverage? I must admit I was intrigued. And also proud &#8211; being from Norway. Because the technology behind the hologram experiment was provided by the Norwegian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.betatales.com%2F2008%2F11%2F08%2Fnews-holograms-is-it-a-threat-to-medias-credibility%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.betatales.com%2F2008%2F11%2F08%2Fnews-holograms-is-it-a-threat-to-medias-credibility%2F&amp;source=johnei&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>It was described as a hologram &#8211; and was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thOxW19vsTg">used for the first time</a> in the TV business. But is <a class="zem_slink" title="CNN" rel="homepage" href="http://www.cnn.com/">CNN&#8217;s</a> hologram experiment really adding value to the news coverage?</p>
<p>I must admit I was intrigued. And also proud &#8211; being from <a class="zem_slink" title="Norway" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=59.9333333333,10.6833333333&amp;spn=10.0,10.0&amp;q=59.9333333333,10.6833333333%20%28Norway%29&amp;t=h">Norway</a>. Because the technology behind the hologram experiment was provided by the Norwegian company <a href="http://vizrt.no/">Virzt</a>.</p>
<p>This is how it looked on CNN:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/thOxW19vsTg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/thOxW19vsTg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><span id="more-33"></span></p>
<p>But is the experiment really adding to the value of the news coverage? <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=153800">E-Media Tidbits</a>, the online media blog from <a class="zem_slink" title="The Poynter Institute for Media Studies" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Poynter_Institute_for_Media_Studies">Poynter Institute</a>, has some doubts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=153800">Amy Gahran writes: </a></p>
<p><em>In my opinion, this stunt succeeded in being visually interesting and entertaining. I personally like that CNN experiments with new tools, on TV and online. However, this particular tool <span style="font-style: italic;">added absolutely nothing</span> to the substance of the coverage &#8212; and thus, it became a mere stunt that <span style="font-weight: bold;">trivialized CNN&#8217;s coverage</span>. </em></p>
<p>I think it is an interesting reflection. While <a href="http://www.vizrt.com/news/press_releases/article3918.ece">the technology is amazing</a>, we need to ask whether it actually improves the credibility of the medium.</p>
<p>Personally I think CNN is doing OK. And the main reason is that they do not pretend that the person actually is in the same room as the anchor.</p>
<p>But if they cross that border, pretending that the image is real, the credibility certainly is at risk.</p>
<p>It will be very interesting to observe how this technology will be used by the media in the years to come.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/79b8df08-5566-4892-a7a7-d4e60f0697a7/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=79b8df08-5566-4892-a7a7-d4e60f0697a7" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betatales.com/2008/11/08/news-holograms-is-it-a-threat-to-medias-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

